<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2.1" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Reasonably Logical</title>
	<link>http://www.philipreames.com/Blog</link>
	<description>Reflections on technology, society, and their infinite interactions</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 03:36:30 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.1</generator>

	<item>
		<title>Comment on 2008 Christmas List by 2009 Birthday and Christmas List &#124; Reasonably Logical</title>
		<link>http://www.philipreames.com/Blog/2008/12/06/2008-christmas-list/#comment-1256</link>
		<author>2009 Birthday and Christmas List &#124; Reasonably Logical</author>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 18:32:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.philipreames.com/Blog/2008/12/06/2008-christmas-list/#comment-1256</guid>
		<description>[...] season once again. To anticipate some questions, I&#8217;m throwing up my wish list here. Unlike last year, there are some physical things for myself on here. Having said that, a gift in the form of a [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] season once again. To anticipate some questions, I&#8217;m throwing up my wish list here. Unlike last year, there are some physical things for myself on here. Having said that, a gift in the form of a [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Same Sex Marriage in Iowa beginning April 24th! by Vermont Legalizes Same-Sex Marriage &#124; Reasonably Logical</title>
		<link>http://www.philipreames.com/Blog/2009/04/03/same-sex-marriage-in-iowa-beginning-april-24th/#comment-1147</link>
		<author>Vermont Legalizes Same-Sex Marriage &#124; Reasonably Logical</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2009 22:59:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.philipreames.com/Blog/2009/04/03/same-sex-marriage-in-iowa-beginning-april-24th/#comment-1147</guid>
		<description>[...] Reasonably Logical Reflections on technology, society, and their infinite interactions      &#171; Same Sex Marriage in Iowa beginning April 24th! [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Reasonably Logical Reflections on technology, society, and their infinite interactions      &laquo; Same Sex Marriage in Iowa beginning April 24th! [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Never fight your way through a phone menu again by John exhiffurf</title>
		<link>http://www.philipreames.com/Blog/2008/08/15/never-fight-your-way-through-a-phone-menu-again/#comment-677</link>
		<author>John exhiffurf</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2008 11:58:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.philipreames.com/Blog/2008/08/15/never-fight-your-way-through-a-phone-menu-again/#comment-677</guid>
		<description>First of all congratulation for such a great site. I learned a lot reading article here today. I will make sure i visit this site once a day so i can learn more.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First of all congratulation for such a great site. I learned a lot reading article here today. I will make sure i visit this site once a day so i can learn more.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on &#8220;Open letter to white activists.&#8221; by reames</title>
		<link>http://www.philipreames.com/Blog/2008/11/10/kevins-open-letter-to-white-activists/#comment-522</link>
		<author>reames</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2008 02:24:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.philipreames.com/Blog/2008/11/10/kevins-open-letter-to-white-activists/#comment-522</guid>
		<description>Connor, you are 100% correct.  I made a mistake and assumed it was something he wrote.  Sorry for the confusion.  I've updated the post to reflect the correct authorship.  Please pass my apologies to your wife.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Connor, you are 100% correct.  I made a mistake and assumed it was something he wrote.  Sorry for the confusion.  I&#8217;ve updated the post to reflect the correct authorship.  Please pass my apologies to your wife.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on &#8220;Open letter to white activists.&#8221; by Connor</title>
		<link>http://www.philipreames.com/Blog/2008/11/10/kevins-open-letter-to-white-activists/#comment-521</link>
		<author>Connor</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2008 00:07:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.philipreames.com/Blog/2008/11/10/kevins-open-letter-to-white-activists/#comment-521</guid>
		<description>That's actually my wife's writing there, not your friend Kevin.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s actually my wife&#8217;s writing there, not your friend Kevin.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Thoughts on the bailout by IAmBobDole</title>
		<link>http://www.philipreames.com/Blog/2008/09/24/thoughts-on-the-bailout/#comment-349</link>
		<author>IAmBobDole</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Sep 2008 19:43:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.philipreames.com/Blog/2008/09/24/thoughts-on-the-bailout/#comment-349</guid>
		<description>So now that we're here, what do we do? I am massively conflicted about this bailout program. The idea of government stepping in to bail out international banks that were reckless with their own business literally makes my stomach churn. We are privatizing gains and socializ http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NXsXp8h3tLM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2W1eb7ekpkg
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QO99jOS1uSE</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So now that we&#8217;re here, what do we do? I am massively conflicted about this bailout program. The idea of government stepping in to bail out international banks that were reckless with their own business literally makes my stomach churn. We are privatizing gains and socializ <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NXsXp8h3tLM" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NXsXp8h3tLM</a><br />
<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2W1eb7ekpkg" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2W1eb7ekpkg</a><br />
<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QO99jOS1uSE" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QO99jOS1uSE</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Never fight your way through a phone menu again by John</title>
		<link>http://www.philipreames.com/Blog/2008/08/15/never-fight-your-way-through-a-phone-menu-again/#comment-201</link>
		<author>John</author>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Aug 2008 20:29:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.philipreames.com/Blog/2008/08/15/never-fight-your-way-through-a-phone-menu-again/#comment-201</guid>
		<description>From the web interface, you can delete a previously recorded call; it removes it right away from the interface; how long that takes to *actually* be removed from the system, and backups, I don't know- that would really be a question for the guys at fonolo.

Ultimately, you can say the same about any service that provides any sort of voice service, including telco's that provide mobile and home phone services, whether you're using "traditional" land lines, VOIP or a wireless device.

Teleco's record your voicemail by request- who knows how long those recordings stick around after you delete them- and who's to say they aren't recording your call for marketing or targeted advertising.

Ultimately, no matter how you're making a phone call, there is always *at least* one party (likely several) between you and the person you're calling, all of whom have the ability to capture the call. 

Honestly, I'm more worried about the bigger guys (the AT&#38;T, Sprint, Bell, Telus, etc)- they have more to gain from content-base advertising, and are bigger targets for government interests, just because of the sheer volume of calls they do.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From the web interface, you can delete a previously recorded call; it removes it right away from the interface; how long that takes to *actually* be removed from the system, and backups, I don&#8217;t know- that would really be a question for the guys at fonolo.</p>
<p>Ultimately, you can say the same about any service that provides any sort of voice service, including telco&#8217;s that provide mobile and home phone services, whether you&#8217;re using &#8220;traditional&#8221; land lines, VOIP or a wireless device.</p>
<p>Teleco&#8217;s record your voicemail by request- who knows how long those recordings stick around after you delete them- and who&#8217;s to say they aren&#8217;t recording your call for marketing or targeted advertising.</p>
<p>Ultimately, no matter how you&#8217;re making a phone call, there is always *at least* one party (likely several) between you and the person you&#8217;re calling, all of whom have the ability to capture the call. </p>
<p>Honestly, I&#8217;m more worried about the bigger guys (the AT&amp;T, Sprint, Bell, Telus, etc)- they have more to gain from content-base advertising, and are bigger targets for government interests, just because of the sheer volume of calls they do.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Never fight your way through a phone menu again by reames</title>
		<link>http://www.philipreames.com/Blog/2008/08/15/never-fight-your-way-through-a-phone-menu-again/#comment-200</link>
		<author>reames</author>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Aug 2008 21:20:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.philipreames.com/Blog/2008/08/15/never-fight-your-way-through-a-phone-menu-again/#comment-200</guid>
		<description>John, first of all, thank you for the correction.  I appreciate it.

However, even with optional recording I still have privacy concerns:
1)  What if I decide after a call that I don't want that history around?  Does Fonolo have a purge mechanism?  And if they do, how long does it take them to act?  How about backups?  As we've seen elsewhere on the Internet, there is no guarantee this record would ever go away for good.  
2)  Just because they say they're not recording the call, how do I know this is actually true?  It would make sense to transcribe calls for targeting advertising among other things.   Fundamentally, I just don't like the idea of having a third party in the call between me and whoever I'm calling.  
3)  The sale problem mentioned in my original post.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>John, first of all, thank you for the correction.  I appreciate it.</p>
<p>However, even with optional recording I still have privacy concerns:<br />
1)  What if I decide after a call that I don&#8217;t want that history around?  Does Fonolo have a purge mechanism?  And if they do, how long does it take them to act?  How about backups?  As we&#8217;ve seen elsewhere on the Internet, there is no guarantee this record would ever go away for good.<br />
2)  Just because they say they&#8217;re not recording the call, how do I know this is actually true?  It would make sense to transcribe calls for targeting advertising among other things.   Fundamentally, I just don&#8217;t like the idea of having a third party in the call between me and whoever I&#8217;m calling.<br />
3)  The sale problem mentioned in my original post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Never fight your way through a phone menu again by John</title>
		<link>http://www.philipreames.com/Blog/2008/08/15/never-fight-your-way-through-a-phone-menu-again/#comment-199</link>
		<author>John</author>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Aug 2008 05:52:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.philipreames.com/Blog/2008/08/15/never-fight-your-way-through-a-phone-menu-again/#comment-199</guid>
		<description>I have a beta account with fonolo- the system works great, and the recording functionality is optional- it doesn't records all your calls automatically.

It's provided as a feature, on a call-by-call basis, for you to record all, or parts of a call, for your records.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have a beta account with fonolo- the system works great, and the recording functionality is optional- it doesn&#8217;t records all your calls automatically.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s provided as a feature, on a call-by-call basis, for you to record all, or parts of a call, for your records.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Attempting to upgrade blog == Ouch! by Alan Hefner</title>
		<link>http://www.philipreames.com/Blog/2008/07/20/attempting-to-upgrade-blog-ouch/#comment-180</link>
		<author>Alan Hefner</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2008 03:44:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.philipreames.com/Blog/2008/07/20/attempting-to-upgrade-blog-ouch/#comment-180</guid>
		<description>There is much hoopla over on the wordpress site about this 2.6 upgrade. Yes, it is the database and the most efficient manner of fixing the problem so far is to start with manually editing the database then going into wp-admin to finish up. I am with you on waiting for the next release to see if the issue gets fixed.
Al</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is much hoopla over on the wordpress site about this 2.6 upgrade. Yes, it is the database and the most efficient manner of fixing the problem so far is to start with manually editing the database then going into wp-admin to finish up. I am with you on waiting for the next release to see if the issue gets fixed.<br />
Al</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
