Archive for the ‘News Events’ Category

Same Sex Marriage in Maine & (sorta) DC

Wednesday, May 6th, 2009

I seem to be witting a lot of these posts in the last couple of weeks. :)

Maine has just passed a same sex marriage bill today. Like Vermont, it passed through the legislative process. It was signed by the governor this morning. So now we have 5 states with same sex marriage. (Iowa, Connecticut, Massachusetts, Vermont, and Maine)

Washington DC recently passed a bill that would require the district to recognize same sex marriages performed in other states. Not quite as good as doing it at home, but given the unique legal position DC holds - Congress has veto rights on all of its laws - its still a major event.

Was it a bug?

Monday, April 13th, 2009

If you’ve read the news today - particularly the gay news - you may have discovered that Amazon has “chosen” to remove all gay & lesbian items from their best seller lists. Now, usually I’d be the first to complain about something like this, but I’m also a programmer. As such, the possibility that it might actually be a bug as Amazon claims isn’t that hard to believe. Writing a new algorithm - which they’ve clearly done - always brings with it the risk of mistakes and bugs. I’m not saying that that is what has happened, but you know? I’m giving them the benefit of the doubt for now.

Now, if they haven’t fixed the issue in a week or two, that’s when I’m going to get upset.

Vermont Legalizes Same-Sex Marriage

Tuesday, April 7th, 2009

According to the Associated Press, Vermont became the first state to legislatively enact same-sex marriage today. Impressively, the state legislature overrode a veto by the governor. Now that is what I call a solid base of support.

Vermont is the fourth state with same-sex marriage. (Connecticut, Massachusetts, and Iowa are the other three.) From the look of it, the District of Columbia might be next. The DC Council today passed a bill which would recognize same sex marriages performed in other states. However, because of DC’s unique legal position, Congress could still scuttle this. Other states in the running include New York, New Jersey, & Hawaii.

On a related note, it looks like the Iowa Supreme Court case legalizing same-sex marriage from last week is safe from legislative challenge.

CT has marriage! (was: Connecticut marriage case to be announced shortly)

Friday, October 10th, 2008

The case that has been before the Connecticut Supreme Court on marriage equality has been decided. They’re announcing the results within the next 1/2 hour. We don’t know what they are yet, but we know it was a very close decision. If you’re a person of faith, please join me in praying for a pro-equality result. I will be.

Love Makes a Family

CT Supreme Court

UPDATE (10:40 am): The case has been released and is a pro-equality decision! Connecticut is the 3rd state to have gay marriage!

Check out the actual decision!

Nice to see some public officials have a backbone

Thursday, October 9th, 2008

I ran across the news story below and felt like cheering. Apparently, the banks have - no surprise - not being doing their legal duty before evicting people from foreclosed homes. The Cook County sheriff has essentially said “enough is enough!”. Frankly, I couldn’t agree with him more.

I absolutely loved this quote from the Illinois Bankers Association:

“The reality is that by ignoring the law and his legal responsibilities, he is carrying out ‘vigilantism’ at the highest level of an elected official,” it said. “The Illinois banking industry is working hard to help troubled homeowners in many ways, but Sheriff Dart’s declaration of ‘martial law’ should not be tolerated.”

Bullshit. The sheriff is doing his job and saying that the banks must do theirs. If they haven’t met the legal requirements for eviction, he shouldn’t be evicting anyone. Period. End of story. He is in the right here; not them.

Illinois sheriff scolds banks for evictions of ‘innocent’ renters
CNN, 10-9-08

Good discussion of Credit Default Swaps (CDS)

Tuesday, September 30th, 2008

If you’re like me, you’ve probably heard some mention of these things over the last couple of weeks, but had absolutely no idea what the heck they were. If so, I strongly recommend reading the article below. It provides a good overview of them in a way that I actually feel like I (somewhat) understand the issues.

The $55 trillion question
The financial crisis has put a spotlight on the obscure world of credit default swaps - which trade in a vast, unregulated market that most people haven’t heard of and even fewer understand. Will this be the next disaster?
By Nicholas Varchaver, senior editor and Katie Benner, writer-reporter, CNN Money
Last Updated: September 30, 2008: 12:28 PM ET

Thoughts on the bailout

Wednesday, September 24th, 2008

If you’ve been following the news this week, I’m sure you’ve heard about how the US economy is in desperate straights and that we desperately need to bail out Wall Street. Do I believe that the US economy is about to collapse? Not really. Do I think we face a serious recession and possibly even a depression? Yes. But remember folks, they happen periodically. It sucks to be one, but we will get through it and recover.

Let’s consider the reason for the economic problems we’re now facing. The price of real estate has gotten completely out of sync with its actual value and people’s ability to pay. About 10 years ago, prices started going up exponentially versus the fairly linear increases they’d followed for the last hundreds of years. Given this, it was really only a matter of time before a reset had to happen. Well, now is that time. The price of real estate has fallen dramatically and probably will keep falling for a while yet. Even the current prices are still too high. They haven’t fallen enough to get back to where they should be yet.

Before you start panicking too much folks, remember this is a good thing for most of us! Now, if you bought a home in the last ten years or so, you’re screwed. Sorry. For the rest of us though, I’m frankly looking forward to the day when I can actually afford to buy a home in Fairfield County.

However, the problem our economy is facing is a little broader than that. The brilliant folks on Wall Street decided that since real estate and mortgages were risky they were going to spread the risk around (diversify) as much as possible. (Note: By itself, that isn’t actually a bad idea.) The problem came when everyone decided that since *they* weren’t exposed to any risk, why should they be careful about who the loaned money to or how much they loaned? After all, *they* would still get their money back right? Well, once everyone started doing this, the quality of the average mortgage went *way* down and the average amount went up - which of course just helped the price explosion described above. End result, we have a lot of low quality debt (mortgages, CDOs, etc..) spread all over the US and world financial system.

Well, people finally realized that no one has any idea how much this crappy debt is actually worth. (Answer: Probably not much.) As such, no one is willing to buy it. Since a lot of businesses depended on being able to buy and sell assets to keep cash flow up, they found themselves in a bad situation. With a lot of assets they can’t sell, even if those assets were actually worth something, they can’t stay in business. This is what happened to a lot of the major investment banks which were (in)famous for their high leveraged business models.

Frankly, I wish we could just let them all hang. They got themselves into this; they should suffer the consequences. The problem with that is that they drug the rest of us in too.

On the lending side of things, since what were perfectly stable businesses are failing left and right, no one wants to loan anyone else money since there is a chance they might not get it back. End result, no one can borrow money and even more businesses go “boom”. The big worry at this point is that the bad debt is so widely held and that there is so much of it, that we could see a cascade effect well outside of the financial industry. When banks are in trouble - like now - they tend not to want to loan anyone money. End result, recession or possibly even a depression.

Now, let’s not kid ourselves, what I’ve described above could be bad. *Really bad.* As in, a lot of people loose jobs bad. (For the record, I work in the finance industry. As such, I’m definitely not ignoring this aspect.) However, in all honesty I think the $700 BILLION - nearly as much as Iraq & Afghanistan combined* - bailout of Wall Street would be worse in the long run. Bailing them out once does nothing to address the fundamental problems and frankly just encourages them to do it again. If we’re going to fix this, we need to fix the root causes.

If we absolutely must bail them out, let’s give them a loan instead. One with 10% interest a year, and first right of repayment. (In other words, let’s make a profit and minimize our – the taxpayers’ – risk.) After that though, let’s go after the fundamental causes of the crisis so this doesn’t happen again.

* This used to read “more than Iraq & Afghanistan combined”. I got this statement from someone else - don’t remember who unfortunately - and it turns out to be not quite accurate anymore. According to the Government Accountability Office, we’d spent $635.9 billion on the “War on Terror” as of December 2007. However, if you include the spending this year to Sept 15, the total jumps to $807 billion. Updated: 9-26-08

Assorted News Articles

Saturday, August 9th, 2008

Rather than make a separate post for each of these, I’m stringing together a couple of interesting news articles and making one big post out of them.


Judge OKs adult trial for teen suspect

Attorney sought juvenile court for fatal shooting case
By Raul Hernandez, Ventura County Start
Friday, July 25, 2008

The judge responsible for the trail of the young boy who shot a (gay) classmate in California a few months back has decided that he must face an adult court, not juvenile court. Excuse me but the kid is 14! If he’s not a juvenile, who the heck is?

I thought I’d mentioned this before, but I can’t find the reference if I did.

Bush signs sweeping AIDS bill
Landmark measure repeals ban on HIV-positive immigrants and visitors
By LOU CHIBBARO JR, Washington Blade | Jul 30, 3:00 PM

OK, some mostly good news this time. The long standing ban against people with HIV traveling to the United States has been repealed. The congressional mandate was reversed, but there is still one more step to see it totally gone. The Department of Health and Human Services must change their policy, and unfortunately that is unlike to happen as long as we have Bush in office.

Assembly’s Gay Rites Backers Reap Benefits
Donations Pour In for Republicans
By JACOB GERSHMAN, Staff Reporter of the Sun | August 7, 2008

Nice to see that some Republicans can vote in support of gay marriage and keep there seats. Maybe my party isn’t total hopeless after all…

OK, more articles to come, but I need a break from typing. :)

Marriage close enough to drive to

Friday, August 1st, 2008

Not that I have anyone to drive there with… (I’m taking applications for that position if anyone’s interested. -_- )

I doubt this is really news to anyone given how much press coverage it got, but given the significance I figured I’d go ahead and post it anyways. For the first time ever, out-of-state same-sex couples can get married in Massachusetts.

Mass. lawmakers OK all gay marriages
Advocate News
Tuesday, July 29, 2008

Goverment enforcement of copyright

Thursday, July 31st, 2008

One of the strengths/weakness (depending on whom you ask) of copyright law has long been that the government had no real roll in enforcing it. If someone was misusing your copyright, it’s your job to find them, sue them, and prove your case. The only real help the government provides is the court room.

However, this may soon change. There is a bill being introduced in the Senate that would grant the US Attorney General the ability to file civil law suits and the responsibility to enforce copyright. While there are some pluses to the bill (mostly to copyright holders like music labels and movie studios) the consequences of the bill are quite scary.

First, the government has significantly more resources than even the richest company. And since the government is not out to make a profit, there’s no “it’s not worth it financially” incentive to restrict suits. As a result, were likely to find the number of enforcement suits going way up. Personally, I don’t like that idea much at all.

More importantly though, this is breaking into some significant new legal ground. Traditionally, the government has been (in theory at least) a neutral party in the battle* between consumer rights and corporate profits. This bill would bring the government down strongly on the “wrong” side of that battle. It sets the government up as the enforcer of corporate policy and profits. Equally importantly, the government has traditionally had no roll in the enforcement of civil law. This bill will be opening a while new legal arena in terms of government involvement and possible prosecution. Do you really want the government suing you for libel? (Say of George W Bush or Hillary Clinton?) We’re heading in that direction folks.

* Yes “battle” is a slightly inflammatory term, but can you truthfully tell me its become anything less?

Further Reading:

Senators Announce New Intellectual Property Enforcement Bill
Posted by Richard Esguerra of the Electronic Frontier Foundation

Some of the articles best quotes are:

The real “problem” may be that some so-called “offenses” can’t be proven beyond a reasonable doubt, the standard for any crime. This new provision would allow the AG to sidestep that high burden of proof — a burden that gives the average citizen an important measure of protection from the overwhelming power of the government.

If the bill is passed, something as simple as taking your iPod to Mexico could be considered an infringement of the copyright owners’ distribution right.

Civil law (legal system)
From Wikipedia

Lawsuit
From Wikipedia